But this workflow has some serious disadvantages. civil ed and not as you see it in revit.( no materials and other visual effects.īut what i see in the first video of Aeco is that instead of open roads technology,You must build a project, in which every floor is a different file and in the end all floors attached to a separate file to built the whole model. In Autodesk side you need object enables ,witch sometimes don't work perfect between Autocad and its vertical, but you cannot doing this with revit which you should export it in order only to see in in e.g. Is that true? I dont know if this could be done with the previous version of power in roads which was project based like the old Autodesk land desktop. I open a dgn file which i made with the live training that i get a month ago with Power in roads, and i open it with aeco and of course i cant edit it but i can model some things save the file and then continue with power in roads. And then continue with power in roads, with road design. So i believe that if you make a model with power in roads you can open it with Aeco and you can model some building elements it. Revit duplicate windows on upper floor trial#I have also download a 30 day trial today.īut after watching the first videos, not fascinated at all and i want to ask a few things to decide if its worth to continue training.Īt first i must say, that what i liked in bentley ,is that it has the same platform for the most of its products. So last days i watched some videos of Aecosim building designer. I,m from Greece where its difficult to find microstation users.įor education and skill improvement i start watching the training videos of microstation and open roads technology, and in many cases i like very much some features they have. I use Autocad, Civil 3d, Revit Architecture and in the past autocad architecture. First of all i must say that i am an Autodesk user.
0 Comments
Leave a Reply. |
AuthorWrite something about yourself. No need to be fancy, just an overview. ArchivesCategories |